Answers about condense.chat, its use cases, and how it integrates.
This page covers the questions technical buyers usually ask before trying condense.chat. The answers match the public homepage and docs.
Frequently asked questions
What is condense.chat?
condense.chat is a context compression API and drop-in proxy. It compresses prompts, retrieved documents, and tool output before those tokens are sent to an upstream model provider.
Who is condense.chat for?
It is positioned for teams shipping coding agents, agentic loops, RAG pipelines, and chat products where context cost and context window pressure are real product constraints.
How do you integrate condense.chat?
Point your SDK at
api.condense.chat/{provider} —
/anthropic/v1/messages for the
Anthropic SDK or Claude Code,
/openai/v1/chat/completions for the
OpenAI SDK. Two keys travel on each request: your condense key
(ak_…) in the
X-Condense-Auth-Token header, and
your usual upstream provider key in its normal header (x-api-key
for Anthropic,
Authorization: Bearer for OpenAI).
condense is a drop-in proxy, so there is no separate endpoint to
call. The public docs show the base URL, headers, and example
client setup.
What routes are public and documented?
The docs describe two provider-dialect proxy routes —
POST /anthropic/v1/messages and
POST /openai/v1/chat/completions —
plus GET /healthz.
How do you request access?
The public site presents condense.chat as a private beta. Use the Sign up button on the homepage — it takes you to sign-up, where you claim a key. Already have one? Log in.
Does condense.chat change my model output?
The goal is to preserve the answer while sending fewer tokens. Compression targets redundant or low-value context — repeated boilerplate, verbose tool output, and retrieved passages that don't carry the signal — not the instructions that drive the response. You keep your own model, your own keys, and your own provider; condense only reshapes the context on the way in.
How much can it reduce token usage?
It depends on the workload, but the homepage reports typical savings around 55–70%. Coding agents with heavy tool output, RAG pipelines with citation-heavy payloads, and chat products carrying long histories see the largest reductions because they spend the most tokens on repeatable context.
Which use cases does condense.chat support?
Any workload where context is the cost — coding agents, agentic loops, RAG pipelines, and chat products are just common examples, not a fixed list. condense.chat works the same way for anything that sends large or repetitive context to a model.